<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ProActive Network News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.infovista.com/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.infovista.com</link>
	<description>Real insight into maximizing application and network service performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:22:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carrier Ethernet Services: Summer Reading List with InfoVista by Got Protection? Diversity Schemes and Other Methods &#171; AVIAT NETWORKS: Official Wireless Transmission Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.infovista.com/index.php/2012/08/08/summer-reading-with-infovista-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1022</link>
		<dc:creator>Got Protection? Diversity Schemes and Other Methods &#171; AVIAT NETWORKS: Official Wireless Transmission Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.infovista.com/?p=2014#comment-1022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Carrier Ethernet Services: Summer Reading List with InfoVista (infovista.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carrier Ethernet Services: Summer Reading List with InfoVista (infovista.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carrier Ethernet Support of Multi-CoS is Here! by Christopher Cullan</title>
		<link>http://blog.infovista.com/index.php/2012/03/01/carrier-ethernet-support-of-multi-cos-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Cullan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.infovista.com/?p=1739#comment-1017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi - thanks for your comment!

Best source for the information on Multi-CoS is the specifications themselves, which you can find published here &lt;a href=&quot;http://metroethernetforum.org/page_loader.php?p_id=29&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;http://metroethernetforum.org/page_loader.php?p_id=29&quot;.&lt;/a&gt;

I assume you are referring to Carrier Ethernet 2.0 (CE 2.0) which was launched earlier this year by the Metro Ethernet Forum. CE 2.0 is essentially a branding of related specifications over the course of the last number of years to help the industry understand how Ethernet as a carrier service has evolved. One of those evolutions is the support for multiple classes of service which is critical for business services (aka, bronze, silver, gold) as well as making better use of any data service link such as those used in mobile backhaul where you have a combination of voice traffic, management and synchronization traffic, data and high-value video content. The implementation agreement within MEF 23.1 is really about defining a standard way for operators to align their CoS to promote interoperability in support of off-net access, wholesale mobile backhaul and other multi-operator services so that they can get to market faster. It also helps the Ethernet exchange market on a similar basis. An operator would merely have to use the defined labels (or potentially a subset/superset with appropriate mapping) knowing that on the other side of the ENNI - the labeling would be managed and understood the same way.

The other items of note are the new performance metrics (Mean Delay and Delay Range) along with the 4 performance tiers with CoS performance objectives and that&#039;s where InfoVista&#039;s composite KPIs help by enabling high-level KQIs based on the CPO, which can then be used to drill down to the individual metrics, associated metrics such as traffic usage and resource health and finally manage adherence to the CPO.

I hope that addresses your comment sufficiently.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; thanks for your comment!</p>
<p>Best source for the information on Multi-CoS is the specifications themselves, which you can find published here <a href="http://metroethernetforum.org/page_loader.php?p_id=29" rel="nofollow">&#8220;http://metroethernetforum.org/page_loader.php?p_id=29&#8243;.</a></p>
<p>I assume you are referring to Carrier Ethernet 2.0 (CE 2.0) which was launched earlier this year by the Metro Ethernet Forum. CE 2.0 is essentially a branding of related specifications over the course of the last number of years to help the industry understand how Ethernet as a carrier service has evolved. One of those evolutions is the support for multiple classes of service which is critical for business services (aka, bronze, silver, gold) as well as making better use of any data service link such as those used in mobile backhaul where you have a combination of voice traffic, management and synchronization traffic, data and high-value video content. The implementation agreement within MEF 23.1 is really about defining a standard way for operators to align their CoS to promote interoperability in support of off-net access, wholesale mobile backhaul and other multi-operator services so that they can get to market faster. It also helps the Ethernet exchange market on a similar basis. An operator would merely have to use the defined labels (or potentially a subset/superset with appropriate mapping) knowing that on the other side of the ENNI &#8211; the labeling would be managed and understood the same way.</p>
<p>The other items of note are the new performance metrics (Mean Delay and Delay Range) along with the 4 performance tiers with CoS performance objectives and that&#8217;s where InfoVista&#8217;s composite KPIs help by enabling high-level KQIs based on the CPO, which can then be used to drill down to the individual metrics, associated metrics such as traffic usage and resource health and finally manage adherence to the CPO.</p>
<p>I hope that addresses your comment sufficiently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carrier Ethernet Support of Multi-CoS is Here! by prabin</title>
		<link>http://blog.infovista.com/index.php/2012/03/01/carrier-ethernet-support-of-multi-cos-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>prabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.infovista.com/?p=1739#comment-1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i have one question regarding multi cos in carrier ethernet service 2. What is multi cos and how service provider compliant with multi cos?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have one question regarding multi cos in carrier ethernet service 2. What is multi cos and how service provider compliant with multi cos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on InfoVista Featured in Gartner’s 2011 Application Performance Monitoring Magic Quadrant by Cyril</title>
		<link>http://blog.infovista.com/index.php/2011/10/05/magic-quadrant-application-performance-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.infovista.com/?p=1587#comment-909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi George, 
I would be glad to discuss the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infovista.com/solutions/application-performance-management&quot; title=&quot;application performance management&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;APM&lt;/a&gt; Gartner Magic Quadrant report with you; let’s set up some time for next week.

In addition, if you’d like to learn more about how &lt;a href=&quot;(http://go.infovista.com/RegistrationForm.html?src=http://www.infovista.com/Portals/0/SB_InfoVista_Application_Aware.pdf&amp;CID=701D00000004U75&amp;stat=Download)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;application-aware premium reporting&lt;/a&gt; can help service providers offer differentiated IP-VPN services, gain new customers and fight the IP-VPN revenue crunch, be sure to read more about InfoVista’s solutions . This &lt;a href=&quot;(http://go.infovista.com/RegistrationForm.html?src=http://www.infovista.com/Portals/0/SB_InfoVista_Application_Aware.pdf&amp;CID=701D00000004U75&amp;stat=Download)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;downloadable PDF &lt;/a&gt;delves into how service providers can develop a multi-tiered VPN reporting service portfolio as a mechanism to generate new revenue streams and differentiate service offerings.
All the best!

Cyril]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi George,<br />
I would be glad to discuss the <a href="http://www.infovista.com/solutions/application-performance-management" title="application performance management" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">APM</a> Gartner Magic Quadrant report with you; let’s set up some time for next week.</p>
<p>In addition, if you’d like to learn more about how <a href="(http://go.infovista.com/RegistrationForm.html?src=http://www.infovista.com/Portals/0/SB_InfoVista_Application_Aware.pdf&#038;CID=701D00000004U75&#038;stat=Download)" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">application-aware premium reporting</a> can help service providers offer differentiated IP-VPN services, gain new customers and fight the IP-VPN revenue crunch, be sure to read more about InfoVista’s solutions . This <a href="(http://go.infovista.com/RegistrationForm.html?src=http://www.infovista.com/Portals/0/SB_InfoVista_Application_Aware.pdf&#038;CID=701D00000004U75&#038;stat=Download)" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">downloadable PDF </a>delves into how service providers can develop a multi-tiered VPN reporting service portfolio as a mechanism to generate new revenue streams and differentiate service offerings.<br />
All the best!</p>
<p>Cyril</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on InfoVista Featured in Gartner’s 2011 Application Performance Monitoring Magic Quadrant by George Agu</title>
		<link>http://blog.infovista.com/index.php/2011/10/05/magic-quadrant-application-performance-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>George Agu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.infovista.com/?p=1587#comment-904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We would like to have some more information on Gartner report on Application Performance Monitoring]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We would like to have some more information on Gartner report on Application Performance Monitoring</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on InfoVista Featured in Gartner’s 2011 Application Performance Monitoring Magic Quadrant by George Agu</title>
		<link>http://blog.infovista.com/index.php/2011/10/05/magic-quadrant-application-performance-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>George Agu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.infovista.com/?p=1587#comment-903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We would like to know more about Gartner report on infovista]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We would like to know more about Gartner report on infovista</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on InfoVista Featured in Gartner’s 2011 Application Performance Monitoring Magic Quadrant by EGHOSA</title>
		<link>http://blog.infovista.com/index.php/2011/10/05/magic-quadrant-application-performance-monitoring/comment-page-1/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>EGHOSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.infovista.com/?p=1587#comment-902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i am interested in APM and Optimization tool]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am interested in APM and Optimization tool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maximizing on the Benefits of Ethernet Backhaul Transformation by Steve H</title>
		<link>http://blog.infovista.com/index.php/2011/07/26/ethernet-backhaul-transformation-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.infovista.com/?p=1389#comment-738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well written Mr. Doussau. Some great and valid observations.
Looking forward to the webinar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written Mr. Doussau. Some great and valid observations.<br />
Looking forward to the webinar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Service Provider Insights for Ensuring Mobile Quality of Experience, Part 1 by sandeepsingh</title>
		<link>http://blog.infovista.com/index.php/2010/09/28/ensuring-mobile-qoe/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>sandeepsingh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.infovista.com/?p=778#comment-538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi ,
Thanks for sharing this information/perspective. I have a doubt/question about this area and it would be cherished if you could share your views on this. 

I have been reading/expericing about the operator&#039;s focus on Service Assurance based on the collection ,correlation,Analysis of data but from what i understand one also needs to understand that what kind of device/application/OS is being used to access the network which could be a considerable factor when it comes of QOE. So i believe end-to-end view must include what device is being used ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ,<br />
Thanks for sharing this information/perspective. I have a doubt/question about this area and it would be cherished if you could share your views on this. </p>
<p>I have been reading/expericing about the operator&#8217;s focus on Service Assurance based on the collection ,correlation,Analysis of data but from what i understand one also needs to understand that what kind of device/application/OS is being used to access the network which could be a considerable factor when it comes of QOE. So i believe end-to-end view must include what device is being used &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Service Provider Insights for Ensuring Mobile Quality of Experience, Part 1 by Ari Banerjee</title>
		<link>http://blog.infovista.com/index.php/2010/09/28/ensuring-mobile-qoe/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Banerjee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 04:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.infovista.com/?p=778#comment-343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cg0769. Thanks for your comments. Would love to have a discussion with you on this topic. You can reach me at banerjee@heavyreading.com. Looking forward to speaking with you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cg0769. Thanks for your comments. Would love to have a discussion with you on this topic. You can reach me at <a href="mailto:banerjee@heavyreading.com">banerjee@heavyreading.com</a>. Looking forward to speaking with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
